11-Sentence Paragraph
This strategy takes the traditional 5 paragraph essay approach and condenses it to 11 sentences. This allows students to practice writing claims and supporting those claims with evidence and elaboration.
7Cs of Critical Historical Analysis
What it is:
A Graphic Organizer for Building Critical Thinking Skills
- A means to build critical thinking skills in students which embeds social justice principles and concepts
- A scaffolded way to develop deep analytical skills, language, and writing while using primary and secondary sources
- An opportunity to have students practice speaking and listening as individuals and in collaboration
- An opportunity to develop vocabulary
- An opportunity to develop writing in smaller chunks that lead to longer writing
- A way to begin students’ connections to action civics and community projects
- A way to infuse common core reading, writing, and speaking skills into daily activities
How to Use It
- Teachers can begin by using one square and scaling or adding more questions as students get familiar with the process
- Teachers have the ability to edit the questions and scaffold the activity to conduct whole group modeling, small group jigsaws, and or have students work individually.
- As students build their critical thinking skills, teachers can increasingly focus on questions around power and the impact on current issues in the communities they teach.
Watch Lead Facilitator, Amparo Chavez-Gonzalez walk you through the 7Cs strategy in the video below.
Thinking Like a Change Maker
This framework helps students explore the Activist Dimension of historical thinking, focusing on how individuals and groups organized and mobilized to create social change. Activism has deep roots in American history, beginning with Patriots like Samuel Adams and the Sons of Liberty, who organized protests, boycotts, and public actions in defense of colonial rights. Activism is a tradition that has shaped American democracy—whether in struggles for independence, abolition, labor rights, or civil rights.
By examining social movements such as the Patriot Movement of the 1770s, the Abolition Movement, labor organizing during the Gilded Age (such as the Knights of Labor and the Pullman Strike), the Selma March, the Black Panther School Breakfast Program, and Black Lives Matter, students analyze how activists built movements, raised public awareness, confronted obstacles, and made lasting impacts. This work encourages students to think critically about the methods used to pursue justice and consider how activism remains central to addressing today’s social issues.
Character Analysis
The Character Analysis is a literacy strategy that asks students to explore a particular historical actor in a thoughtful and critical way by analyzing their life, choices, actions and beliefs. The Character Analysis strategy works best as a means for students to explore historical perspectives of a particular era or for a particular unit. For example, during a unit on Imperialism, a teacher can teach students about the various resistance movements such as the Mau Mau Rebellion, the 1900 Asante War of Resistance, and the Italia-Ethiopian War by asking them to consider how different groups in Africa fought for liberation and how effective these struggles were. By introducing the Character Analysis at this point the teacher assigns students do complete a Character Analysis on some of the historical actors involved in these resistance movements such as Menelik II and Yaa Asantewaa.
The Character Analysis is driven by historical inquiry. Before using this strategy the teacher needs to consider what inquiry question students will be answering from the perspective of their assigned historical actor. In this example the inquiry could be “How did some Africans resist Imperialism, and were these movements successful?” The Character Analysis can also be written in the first person, in which case the inquiry shifts to, “How did you resist Imperialism, and was your movement a success?” In addition to answering the inquiry question, students will also need to write about the historical characters life and life-shaping events, their hopes, dreams, and/or goals, and some of the problems they struggled with in their personal life, or systems of oppression they encountered. All of this requires that teachers provide students with secondary sources, or primary sources, or vetted biographies. We recommend combining a secondary source that provides a short biography paired with a primary source that gives insight to students as to how their assigned historical actor would respond to the inquiry question. Exploring Historical Perspectives is one of the historical thinking concepts introduced in the “Big Six”. This concept helps students understand the people of the past by considering their historical context (Guidepost 3), inferring how people felt and thought in the past (Guidepost 4), and exploring diverse perspectives on the events in which they are involved as a key to understanding historical events (Guidepost 5). The Character Analysis provides students the opportunity to develop this type of conceptual thinking.
The “4 I’s of Oppression”
This handout is based on the 4 I’s of Oppression framework developed by John Bell, which helps us better understand how oppression operates across different levels of society. Rather than seeing oppression as only individual acts or isolated events, this framework allows us to examine how power, inequality, and injustice function through multiple, interconnected systems.
The 4 I’s include:
- Ideological Oppression: The core beliefs and ideas that one group is superior to another.
- Institutional Oppression: The way these ideas are embedded in laws, policies, institutions, and systems.
- Interpersonal Oppression: The ways oppression shows up between people in their daily interactions, behaviors, and language.
- Internalized Oppression: When individuals absorb and accept oppressive ideas and apply them to themselves or others within their own group.
Document Based Inquiry Poster
Document-Based Inquiry (DBI) is a collaborative strategy that helps students analyze primary and secondary sources, corroborate evidence, group sources by theme, and develop a thesis. It is inspired by the Document-Based Question (DBQ) essay, which is one of the most rigorous tasks in history education. The DBI scaffolds the process to make it more accessible. In small groups, students examine a curated set of sources and discuss how each one supports, contradicts, or adds complexity to a prompt.
We recommend pairing the DBI Poster with our 11-Sentence Paragraph strategy, which guides students in transforming their analysis into a structured written response. This strategy also works well with any of our source sets.
X-Ray Personality Profile
The X-Ray Profile is an individual or team art piece that operates in metaphor. Generally done based on the information, ideas, and philosophy of an individual, they can also be done for a time period, group of people, geographic space, or idea. This art piece can be one of either pure research, based on teacher provided material or a blend. I generally go with the blended approach, providing students with substantial materials then asking students to do detailed, focused research. There are several tasks which need to be completed for this art piece and I ask student to divide up who will “facilitate or lead” each task. It is assumed that all students will participate in all aspects of the art piece but I’ve concluded that at least one student needs to be responsible for each part to be sure that it is brought to fruition beautifully. Designed by former Roosevelt High School Teacher, Brian Gibbs
HAPP-y Speaking & Listening Strategy
The HAPP-Y Strategy helps students analyze primary sources while practicing speaking, listening, and evidence-based discussion. Students are assigned investigator roles to examine a document through five key lenses:
- H – Historical Context: When and where was the document created? What was happening at the time?
- A – Audience: Who was the intended audience? How might that affect the message?
- P – Purpose: Why was the document created? What was the author’s goal?
- P – Point of View: What biases or perspectives does the author bring?
- Y – Why is it significant: How does this document help answer the historical question?
Students use guiding questions and sentence frames to prepare, share, and discuss their findings, allowing them to build historical arguments together while developing academic speaking and listening skills.
Created by Christopher Lewis and Jennifer Yoo-Brannon, the HAPP-Y Strategy supports inquiry, literacy, and student-centered historical thinking.
Critical Analysis of a Claim
The Critical Analysis of a Claim strategy helps students strengthen their historical thinking and argumentation skills by teaching them how to critique, challenge, and build alternative claims using evidence from primary and secondary sources.
In this strategy, students:
- Critique: Identify problems or weaknesses in a historical argument or claim.
- Counter Evidence: Gather and cite specific evidence from multiple sources that challenges the original claim.
- Counterargument: Use that evidence to develop an alternative argument or interpretation.
This approach supports students in weighing multiple perspectives, analyzing the strength of evidence, and constructing well-reasoned historical arguments based on sourced material.
Adapted from the Read.Inquire.Write. project (University of Michigan), this strategy is part of UCLA History-Geography Project’s broader inquiry-based approach to teaching history.
Prove It!
The Prove It strategy supports students in building strong, evidence-based historical arguments by guiding them through the process of answering a historical inquiry question, much like constructing a geometry proof. Students develop a thesis statement supported by at least four reasons, each backed by citations from both primary and secondary sources.
Teachers provide students with a curated set of sources to investigate possible evidence, giving students a common foundation for analysis. This structured approach helps students connect historical sources to larger themes and build well-supported claims. As students work collaboratively to develop their thesis statements, they refine their ability to analyze documents and use evidence in writing.
Rooted in the work of Peter Seixas and Carla Peck, the Prove It strategy recognizes that the ability to work with evidence must be systematically taught. The strategy is effective across grade levels, helping both middle and high school students strengthen their historical reasoning, writing, and argumentation skills.


